|
Action text:
|
"Langley Official Community Plan Bylaw 1979 No. 1842 Amendment (Fort Langley Community Plan) Bylaw 1987 No. 2527 Amendment (Fort Langley Design Guidelines Intent) Bylaw 2014 No. 5063";
"Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500 Amendment (Statewood Properties Ltd.) Bylaw 2014 No. 5064"; and
"Township of Langley Sign Bylaw 2012 No. 4927 Amendment (Fort Langley Guidelines) Bylaw 2014 No. 5068"
Explanation – Bylaw No. 5063
R. Seifi explained that Bylaw 2014 No. 5063 amends the Fort Langley Community Plan by clarifying the informative purpose of the Fort Langley Building Façade Design Guidelines, namely to assist but not bind Council in implementing the Fort Langley Community Plan.
Explanation – Bylaw No. 5064
R. Seifi explained that Bylaw 2014 No. 5064 rezones property located at 9220 Glover Road from Community Commercial Zone C-2 to Comprehensive Development Zone CD-100 to permit the development of a three storey, mixed use development.
Explanation – Bylaw No. 5068
R. Seifi explained Bylaw 2014 No. 5068 amends the Township of Langley Sign Bylaw to ensure consistency with the informative intent of the Fort Langley Community Plan and specifically the general building design guidelines.
Heritage Alteration Permit No. 100748
Running concurrently with this Bylaw is Heritage Alteration Permit No. 100748 (Statewood Properties Ltd. / 9220 Glover Road) in accordance with Attachment A subject to the following conditions:
a. Building plans being in substantial compliance with Schedules “A” through “K”;
b. Landscape plans being in substantial compliance with Schedules “L” through “P”, in compliance with the Township’s Street Tree and Boulevard Planting Policy, and to the final acceptance of the Township;
c. Provision of a final tree management plan incorporating tree retention, replacement, protection details, and security in compliance with the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw (Schedule I – Tree Protection) to the acceptance of the Township;
d. Compliance with the Child Friendly Amenity Area requirements to the acceptance of the Township;
e. All signage being in substantial compliance with Schedules “A” through “F” and “H” through “K”, and the Township of Langley Sign Bylaw;
f. Rooftop mechanical equipment being located so that it is screened from view by compatible architectural treatments; and,
g. All refuse areas being either located inside the building or in an enclosure in compliance with Schedule “F” to the acceptance of the Township.
Although not part of the Heritage Alteration Permit requirements, the applicant is advised that prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items will need to be finalized:
a. Provision of an exterior lighting impact plan prepared by an electrical engineer in compliance with the provisions of the Township’s Exterior Lighting Impact Policy to the acceptance of the Township;
b. Provision of a restrictive covenant, acceptable to the Township, that identifies and secures the three (3) adaptable housing units and one (1) accessible housing unit as defined by the Township’s Basic Adaptable Housing Requirements Policy;
c. Payment of cash-in-lieu amount for Child Friendly Amenity Area equivalency, to include land and improvement value, to the acceptance of the Township;
d. Payment of cash-in-lieu amount for Replacement Tree shortfall to the acceptance of the Township;
e. Landscape and boulevard improvements being secured by letter of credit at Building Permit;
f. Submission of a site specific on-site servicing and stormwater management plan in accordance with the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw, and an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw, to the acceptance of the Township;
g. A Highways Use Permit being secured for any projections (i.e. awnings and signage) onto municipal roads, if any, to the satisfaction of the Township;
h. Submission of a geotechnical report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the acceptance of the Township;
i. Payment of applicable Development Cost Charges, 5% Neighbourhood Parkland Acquisition Fee, and Building Permit Administration Fees; and,
j. Payment of supplemental Heritage Alteration Permit application fees, if any.
Submissions regarding Bylaws No. 5063, No. 5064, No. 5068 and Heritage Alteration Permit No. 100748 from the public:
1. Fred Jackson, 22916 – 88 Avenue, was in attendance and stated his support of the project and the adaptable housing proposed.
2. Casey Smith, 23343 Mavis Avenue, was in attendance, and stated his support.
3. Eric Trygg, Telegraph Trail, PO Box 740, was in attendance, and stated his support of the project as it provides 60 more parking spaces for Fort Langley and a pleasant streetscape.
4. Lyle Longstaff,107, 21707 – 88 Avenue, was in attendance and stated his support of the project.
5. Joan Longstaff, 107, 21707 – 88 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
6. Lynne Dennis, 16, 20788 – 87 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it will provide extra shopping and parking.
7. Misty VanPopta, PO Box 41, Fort Langley, was in attendance and commented on spot zoning and stated her support of the project.
8. Kevin Speilman, 6106 – 240 Street, was in attendance and stated his support of the project and commented on the building’s assets.
9. William Dodd, 23165 Muench Trail, was in attendance and stated his support of the project and asked Council to support it.
10. Suellen Dodd, 23165 Muench Trail, was in attendance and stated her support of the project
11. Susan Galick, 7, 23230 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
12. Gerald Wall, 2788 – 272B Street, was in attendance and stated his support of the project.
13. Phil Calla, 23255 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
14. Brenda Smith, 23255 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
15. Brenda Sleightholme, 23288 Francis Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support and asked Council to support it.
16. Pete Speilman, 5280- 240 Street, was in attendance and stated his support of this project and is needed in Fort Langley.
17. Paul Sleightholme, 23288 Francis Avenue, was in attendance and stated that this is fabulous addition to Fort Langley.
18. Barry Dashner, 23318 Francis Avenue, was in attendance and asked Council to support this proposal as it will bring in business and tourism.
19. Catherine Doyle, 9193 Seney Place, was in attendance and asked Council to approve this project.
20. Patricia Scott, 8928 Mackie Street, was in attendance and stated her support.
21. Brian Scott, 8928 Mackie Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
22. Richard Deacon, 9023 Trattle Street, was in attendance and asked Council to approve this project.
23. Grace Muller, 23745 – 40 Avenue, was in attendance and asked Council to not approve this project as it does not follow the heritage guidelines that are in place.
24. Jenn Bateman, 6951 – 208A Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it is both functional and beautiful.
25. Denise Jager, 1B, 9110 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it will help her business.
26. Julie Jager, 5414 – 247A Street, was in attendance and stated her support.
27. Jamie Clark, 23140 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated his support of the project.
28. Charlie Seaman, 21159 – 93 Avenue, was in attendance and stated his support of this project.
29. Shirley Rempel, 9179 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated her support of this project.
30. Don Rempel, 9179 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated his support of the project.
31. Sue Bennett, 8483 – 214 Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it will enhance Fort Langley.
32. Dan Bennett, 8483 – 214 Street, was in attendance and stated his support of the project as it revitalize Fort Langley. He asked Council to support the project.
33. Janice Ubelhardt, 23330 Francis Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support of this project and asked Council to approve the bylaws.
34. Garry Elliott, 23330 Francis Avenue, was in attendance and stated his support of this project as it will be a great addition to the downtown core.
35. Carolyn MacLaren, 8932 Bartlett Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it will make a positive impact. She asked Council to approve the project.
36. Jennifer Carlson, 8940 Bartlett Street, was in attendance stated her support of this project and asked Council to approve the bylaws.
37. Deanne Lambert, 25160 – 72 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support of this project.
38. Angela Shpeley, 5523 – 240 Street, was in attendance and stated her support.
39. Blair Shpeley, 5523 – 240 Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
40. Howie Vickberg, 8995 Bartlett Street, was in attendance and asked Council to support the proposal.
41. Harold Whittell, 35 – 208 Street, was in attendance and expressed concerns regarding not following the heritage guidelines, building heights in conservation areas, and changing the Fort Langley Official Community Plan. He provided copies of the court case decision on table.
Councilor Dornan temporarily left the meeting at 8:05pm and rejoined the meeting at 8:06pm.
42. Penny Allen, 23215 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
43. John Allen, 23215 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
44. Kimberly McFarland, 57, 1055 Riverwood Gate, Port Coquitlam, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it will provide more local shopping.
45. Diane Zepeski, 8856 Hudson Bay Street, was in attendance, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
46. Joe Zepeski, 8856 Hudson Bay Street, was in attendance and stated his support of the project as it will provide more residences, businesses and parking for Fort Langley.
47. Elizabeth Schulz, 8864 Hudson Bay Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
48. Rudy Schulz, 8864 Hudson Bay Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
49. Elaine Brewer-White, 23033 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
50. Judy Nygren, 4, 23230 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
51. Connie Blundy, 23014 Jenny Lewis Avenue, President of the Fort Langley Community Association, was in attendance and expressed concerns with how the Township deals with development planning.
52. Lorraine Braddell, 23136 Muench Trail, was in attendance and stated her support of this project as new development is needed in Fort Langley. She asked Council to review the Fort Langley OCP.
53. Gary Sawatsky, 23136 Muench Trail, was in attendance and stated his support of this project.
54. Frank Cox, 9385 Casimir Steet, was in attendance and asked that the Coulter Berry building be completed as soon as possible as it sets a new building standard for Fort Langley.
55. Kelly Holmes, 8877 Wright Street, was in attendance and stated her support of this proposal.
56. Brian Holmes, 8877 Wright Street, was in attendance and stated his support of the project.
57. Margo Harrison, 8933 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
58. David Harrison, 8933 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated his support of the project.
59. Sheilah Friesen, 21650 – 50B Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it will provide more parking for Fort Langley.
60. Lawana Quest, 6033 Greenside Dive, E. Surrey, was in attendance and stated her support of the project as it will provide more parking, accessible housing, and beautiful aesthetics.
61. Kailah Soanes, 8246 – 151 Street, Surrey, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
62. Joan Morris, 23055 – 96 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her opposition to the proposal. She asked Council to not support the bylaws.
63. Angela Gauthier, 9388 Waska Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
64. Stephan Schigas, 22961 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
65. Katie Rempel, 9179 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
66. Jonathan Rempel, 9179 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
67. Gareth Abreo, 23245 Mavis Avenue, was in attendance and stated his opposition to the proposal.
68. Kaitlyn Warmerdam, 23245 Mavis Avenue, was in attendance and stated her opposition to the project as it is too large.
69. Curtis Zondag, 9025 – 203B Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
70. Laura Murphy, 9025 – 203B Street, was in attendance and stated her support.
71. Dixie Jacobson, 6612 – 224 Street, was in attendance and stated her support.
72. Carol Travelbea, 9045 Hadden Street, was in attendance and stated her support.
73. Gary Travelbea, 9045 Hadden Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
74. Dawn Sandberg, 23144 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
75. Marlyn Charney, 23096 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
76. John Sparrow, 8861 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
77. Susan Falk, 2208 – 232 St, was in attendance and stated her support.
78. Jasmine Marjanovic, 9203 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
79. Charles McPhee, 8921 Mowat Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
80. Albert Malowany, 21375 Old Yale Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
81. Florence Webber, 26458 – 29B Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support.
82. Roxann McKamey, 9188 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
83. Megan McKamey, 9188 Glover Road, was in attendance stated her support.
84. Al Peterson, 2349 Wakefield Court, was in attendance stated his support.
85. Sarah Fraser, 102, 19939 – 55A Avenue, was in attendance and stated her opposition due to the overall size.
86. Dorothy Anderson, 24990 – 84 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support.
87. Albert Anderson, 24990 – 84 Avenue, was in attendance and stated his support.
88. Joe and Sigrid Weber, 8753 Armstrong Road, was in attendance and stated their support.
89. James Hansen, on behalf of Stefania Venusio, 27, 8930 Walnut Grove Drive, was in attendance and stated their support of the project.
90. Gary Walsh, 9217 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
91. Hiro Tsujimoto, 9203 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
92. Rick Masana, 9203 Glover Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
93. Chris Roper, 8288 – 207A Street, was in attendance and stated his support.
94. Emmy Antaya, 20178 – 96 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support due to its sustainability.
95. Lois Peterson, 20658 – 90A Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support.
96. Dr. Mike Neilson, 23255 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated his support.
97. Wendy Neilson, 23255 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support.
98. Margot MacKenzie, 23155 – 96 Avenue, was in attendance and expressed concerns regarding the height and size of the building, and amending the Fort Langley OCP. She asked Council to protect the Heritage Conservation Area.
99. Andy Schildhorn, 22895 Sales Avenue, was in attendance and submitted a 1,401 signature petition, in opposition.
100. Jane Tidball, 9218 Wright Street, was in attendance and stated her support.
101. Katherine Hope, 5084 – 223B Street, was in attendance and stated her support and commented on the definition of heritage.
102. Brent Barton, 22985 Coulter Court, was in attendance and stated his support.
Councillor Ferguson temporarily left the meeting at 9:12pm and rejoined the meeting at 9:15pm.
103. Lynda Lightfoot, 5458 – 272 Street, was in attendance and stated her opposition as it does not follow the heritage guidelines.
104. Kay McComish, 7840 – 227 Court, was in attendance and read a letter on behalf of Ralph and Linda Wyatt, stating their opposition.
105. Bays Blackhall, 10184 – 208 Street, was in attendance and commented on the historic significance of Fort Langley.
106. Bob Blackhall, 10184 – 208 Street, was in attendance and read a letter on behalf of Michael Kluckner, Vancouver Heritage Commission, commenting on the height of the upper floors of the building. He suggested 8 or 9 foot ceilings on the upper floors.
Councillor Sparrow temporarily left the meeting at 9:28pm and rejoined the meeting at 9:32pm.
107. Harold Punnett, 9066 Gay Street, was in attendance and commented on the process of amending the bylaws and OCP and asked Council to reject this proposal.
108. Cathy Brama, 2971 – 270B Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
109. Bob Armstrong, 8042 Armstrong Road, was in attendance and stated his opposition.
110. Shirley Sawatsky, 24968 – 56 Avenue, was in attendance and stated he support.
111. Lloyd Sawatsky, 24968 – 56 Avenue, was in attendance and stated his support.
112. Anne Wilson, 20712 – 82 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her support.
113. Ted Lightfoot, 5458 – 272 Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition. He read a letter on behalf of Kathryn Molloy, Executive Director, Heritage BC, expressing concerns regarding the project.
Councillor Dornan temporarily left the meeting at 9:43pm and rejoined the meeting at 9:44pm.
114. Dylan Fraser, 8172 – 211 Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition due to its size.
115. Fred Pepin, 25323 – 12 Avenue, representing the Langley Heritage Society, was in attendance and stated their opposition. He further commented on spot zoning in a heritage conservation area.
116. Lotte Elias, 22987 – 88 Avenue, was in attendance and stated her opposition to the project and asked to Council to vote no.
117. Carol Kershaw, 23343 Mavis Avenue, was in attendance, was in attendance stated her opposition as she feels it will change the historic feel of Fort Langley.
118. Marlene Hoyt, 8981 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated her opposition to the project.
119. Cambria Olsen, 8996 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated her opposition to the project due to the height of the building.
120. George Derksen, 8982 Major Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition due to the building height.
121. Irene McKaig, 1189 – 232 Street, was in attendance and commented on the heritage of Fort Langley.
122. Michael Lloyd, 7710 – 232 Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition to the project. He asked Council to stay with two storeys.
123. Sylvia Sparks, 8834 Bartlett Street, was in attendance and stated her support of the project.
124. Diane Simpson, Heritage Manor, Fort Langley, was in attendance and stated her opposition.
125. C. L., no fixed address, was in attendance and stated his opposition.
126. Darcy Rezac, 23215 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated his support of the project. He further commented on miscommunication and asked Council to support the proposal.
127. Gayle Hallgren-Rezac, 23215 Billy Brown Road, was in attendance and stated her support of the project. She asked Council to support the proposal.
128. Heidi Cave, 9325 Douglas Street, Fort Langley, was in attendance and stated her support.
129. Mike McManus, 8990 Wright Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition. He asked Council to reject the proposal.
130. Dyan Olsen, 8996 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated her opposition due to size.
131. Mike Fraser, 8950 Mackie Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition due to size.
Councillor Dornan temporarily left the meeting at 10:42pm and rejoined the meeting at 10:43pm.
132. Alison Hewitt, 9019 Wright Street, was in attendance and stated her opposition to the project. She asked Council to listen to the concerns of the citizens and not change the guidelines.
133. Mark Eisinger, 9019 Wright Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition.
134. Larry Green, 22850 – 88 Avenue, was in attendance and stated his opposition due to size.
135. Jeromy Streobiki, 22850 – 88 Avenue, was in attendance and stated his opposition to three storeys.
136. Nancy Gleeson, 9133 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated her opposition. She asked Council to reject the proposal.
137. Tim Dolinski, 8975 McAllister Road, was in attendance was in attendance and stated his support.
138. Michael Godwin, 8820 Gay Street, was in attendance and stated his opposition.
139. Gail Chaddock-Costello, 8865 Wright Street, was in attendance and stated her opposition. She commented on keeping Fort Langley a heritage landmark.
140. Deanna Horn, 21073 – 45A Crescent, was in attendance and stated her support of the project. She asked council to approve the re-zoning.
The following written submissions regarding Bylaws No. 5063,
No. 5064, No. 5068, and Heritage Alteration Permit No. 100748 were received from the public:
1. Board of Directors, Langley Heritage Society, expressing opposition.
2. Board of Directors, Langley Heritage Society, asking Council to not support the proposed amendment to the OCP/Guidelines.
3. 11 signature petition, in opposition.
4. 4 signature petition, in favour.
5. Rob Koenig, expressing concerns regarding scale, character and quality of location.
6. Paul Mendoza, 8955 Hudson Bay Street, expressing support.
7. Kristina Gervais, 32-2837 Louie Crescent, asking Council to not support the alterations to the OCP and Heritage Guidelines.
8. Alan and Suellen Dodd, 23165 Meunch Trail, expressing support.
9. Dave Small, Location Scout, Directors Guild of Canada BC, expressing opposition.
10. Andy Schildhorn, providing three possibilities for changing the building.
11. The MacLaren Family, expressing support.
12. Jill Steacy, expressing opposition.
13. Stella Baker, expressing opposition.
14. Matthew Foy, 9031 Wright Street, expressing opposition.
15. Don and Sharon Shaw, expressing opposition.
16. Dawn Crawford, 22956 Billy Brown Road, expressing support.
17. Cheryl Moore, 8837 Mackie Street, expressing opposition.
18. Kirsti Kuiper, 23109 Muench Trail, expressing opposition.
19. Joel Crawford, 22956 Billy Brown Road, expressing support.
20. Bob Fedoruk, expressing support.
21. Mike Powell, expressing opposition.
22. Joanie Proske, 20787-68 Avenue, expressing opposition.
23. Dennis Linden, expressing support.
24. George Otty, expression opposition.
25. Lee Lockwood, 1473-272 Street, providing input and suggestions.
26. Susan Hille, expressing opposition.
27. Carol Kershaw, expressing opposition.
28. Susan Meitner, expressing opposition.
29. Eric Schaap, asking Council to not approve this development.
30. Michael Kluckner, Vancouver Heritage Commission, asking Council to reject the proposal and have it revised to better fit with historic Fort Langley.
31. Brad Reimer, expressing opposition.
32. Arja Makinen, expressing support.
33. Kathryn Molloy, Executive Director, Heritage BC, expressing concerns regarding the project.
34. Reinhardt Kumpolt, expressing support.
35. Susan Meitner, expressing opposition.
36. Eric Schaap, expressing opposition.
37. Arja Makinen, expressing support.
38. Carol Armstrong, 306, 5489-201 Street, expressing opposition.
39. Anita Stoughton, 23155-96 Avenue, expressing opposition.
40. Chris Tolkamp, expressing opposition.
41. Paul Mendoza, expressing support.
42. Bruce Johnson, expressing opposition.
43. Sylvia Mountain, expressing opposition.
44. Sharon Lamont, expressing opposition.
45. Ken Baber, expressing opposition.
46. Christa Boecker, expressing support.
47. Dennis and Jenny deGroot, 7296 Telegraph Trail, expressing opposition.
48. Troy Board, 9045 Queen Street, expressing opposition.
49. Wayne Johnson, 8765-215 Street, expressing opposition.
50. Jessie Eleanor, expressing concerns regarding the project.
51. Joan Morris, expressing opposition.
52. Madeleine de Little, expressing opposition.
53. Windy Brown, expressing opposition.
54. Barb Hinde, expressing opposition.
55. Anjali Hill, expressing opposition.
56. Boukje Schaap, expressing opposition.
57. Walt Beukers, expressing support.
58. Vicki Richardson, 22784-88 Avenue, expressing opposition.
59. Marilyn Kecskes, expressing opposition.
60. Elaine DePedrina, expressing opposition.
61. De dee Wall, expressing opposition.
62. Susan Hille, expressing opposition.
63. Diane Morrison, asking Council to consider a two storey building.
64. Nedra Lightfoot, 29268 Marsh McCormick Road, Abbotsford, expressing opposition.
65. Bruce Batchelor, 20188-70 Avenue, asking Council to reject the zoning changes and other amendments.
66. Marjorie Lightfoot, expressing opposition.
67. Jennifer Schouten, 301, 8915-202 Street, expressing support.
68. Daniella Symington, expressing opposition.
69. Grant Lamothe, 22910 Bully Brown Road, expressing support.
70. Beverly Kilpatrick, 23142 Billy Brown Road, expressing support.
71. George Derksen, 8982 Major Street, expressing opposition.
72. Louise and Charles McPhee, 8921 Mowat Street, expressing support.
73. 12 signature position, expressing opposition.
74. Kaitlyn Warmerdam, 23245 Mavis Avenue, expressing opposition.
75. Gareth Abreo, 23245 Mavis Avenue, asking Council to reject the proposal.
76. Joel Tibtra, 4680-197A Street, expressing support.
77. Margaret and Gar Wildeman, 8839 Hudson Bay Street, expressing support.
78. Pauline Wilch, 5026-215 Street, expressing support.
79. Heather Lowry, 4922-215 Street, expressing support.
80. Steen Carlsen, 22040-96 Avenue, expressing support.
81. Brian Holmes, 8877 Wright Street, expressing support.
82. Susan Mackenzie, 22908-96 Avenue, expressing opposition.
83. Meghan LaCoste, 9448 Kanaka Street, expressing support.
84. H. Shaw, 20712-82 Avenue, expressing support.
85. Jessica Shaw, 4019-196A Street, expressing support.
86. Melissa Pucely, 3945-202 Street, expressing support.
87. Michael Godwin, newspaper article regarding density.
88. Darcy Rezac, newspaper articles regarding the proposal.
89. Carol Kucharski, expressing opposition.
90. Andy Schildhorn, 22895 Sailes Avenue, submitted a 1,401 signature petition in opposition.
MEETING EXTENDED
Moved by Councillor Fox,
Seconded by Councillor Sparrow,
That the meeting be extended to 12:00am
DEFEATED
Mayor Froese and Councillors Dornan, Ferguson, Long, Richter, and Ward opposed
MEETING ADJOURNED
Moved by Councillor Long,
Seconded by Councillor Davis,
That the meeting adjourn at 11:00pm and reconvene at 7:00pm in the Fraser River Presentation Theatre, on Tuesday, March 11, 2014.
CARRIED
CERTIFIED CORRECT:
________________________________
Mayor
________________________________
Deputy Township Clerk
|